← Search

Pradeep Hariharan

Cary, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
306 matches · 197W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Pradeep Hariharan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history306 matches
L
Amit Kumar / Behram Jamaspi
2026-08-30 · TOC.Jayashankaran · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ranga Narasimhan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · Me.Everitt18M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Klinefelter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-13 · Me.Everitt18M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elissa Coughlin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-29 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-15 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-08 · Me.Everitt18M4.0 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andrea Klinefelter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · JMontague-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Barry Gooch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-01 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-28 · RGoff-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dipen Vyas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-12 · JMontague-DUR · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
John Park / James Moriarty
2026-04-12 · CAS.Nealis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Olimani Deivasigamani
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · JMontague-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Gowland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
74.6%
88W–30L · 61.3% of games
4.0
39%
16W–25L · 47.4% of games
6.5
70%
14W–6L · 65.9% of games
7.5
53.6%
15W–13L · 58.7% of games
3.5mixed
75%
9W–3L · 61.8% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
7W–0L · 75% of games
7.0mixed
74.3%
26W–9L · 61.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
85 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
72 matches
#3 Singles
9%
26 matches
#2 Singles
8%
23 matches
#1 Singles
7%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer