← Search

Alex Piasecki

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
88 matches · 55W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Alex Piasecki to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history88 matches
W
2026-08-30 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Matthew Curry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-23 · TOC.Byrd2 · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Seward Matwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-23 · JByrd.7.5C-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ranjith Dasaradhi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
Amit Kumar / Steven Harris
2026-08-22 · TOC.Byrd · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monty Gaither
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-16 · TOC.Byrd2 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Seward Matwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · TOC.Byrd · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Monty Gaither
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · TOC.Byrd2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ryan Kessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-16 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-12 · JByrd2-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mike Meske
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · JByrd2-DUR · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bharath Dheekonda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
Tyler Carroll / Parv Mital
2026-06-17 · TOC.Byrd2 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jared Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-07 · JByrd2-DUR · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
83.9%
26W–5L · 62% of games
4.0
44%
11W–14L · 47.2% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 52.6% of games
8.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
25 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal