← Search

Tammy Iams

— year-end
209 matches · 61W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tammy Iams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history209 matches
L
2026-07-25 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Beese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
Courtney Dietrich / Joseph Dietrich
2026-07-19 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ragner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · A18 3.0W HF Iams · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Raymond Pulido / Andrea MacChiarella
2026-07-12 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Beese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
Claudia Smith / Erika Raeth
2026-07-11 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Bortz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-08 · A18 3.0W HF Iams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-06 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Vickie Flynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W HF Iams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-17 · A18 3.0W HF Iams · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sarah Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Ragner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
L
Michelle Patterson / Rachel Brahler
2026-06-10 · A18 3.0W HF Iams · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melanie Conner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-07 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with John Beese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
Teams40 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
60%
9W–6L · 52.2% of games
3.0
26.4%
29W–81L · 39.1% of games
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
5.5
32%
16W–34L · 45.5% of games
6.5
40%
4W–6L · 44.9% of games
6.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 37.8% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
42 matches
#1 Singles
20%
42 matches
#2 Singles
8%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams