← Search

Lisa Bortz

— year-end
146 matches · 44W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Bortz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-07-25 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with T Bortz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-12 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with T Bortz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
Claudia Smith / Erika Raeth
2026-07-11 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tammy Iams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W GR Tremmel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kara Wedekamm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-28 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with T Bortz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-24 · A18 3.0W GR MacLane Hodges · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jana Schweikert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-22 · A55 7.0W D GR Robinson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Trask
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with T Bortz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-15 · A55 7.0W D GR Robinson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Plum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-15 · A40 3.0W GR Neely · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lizeth Sinecio
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · X18 6.0 GR Bortz · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with T Bortz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
Michelle Blanda / Anne Fortney
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W GR Tremmel · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginger Neely
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Teams35 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
41.4%
12W–17L · 47.8% of games
3.5
26.4%
14W–39L · 41.1% of games
5.5
60%
3W–2L · 51.1% of games
6.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.8% of games
6.5
50%
4W–4L · 43.4% of games
7.0
15%
3W–17L · 42.1% of games
6.0mixed
20%
3W–12L · 39.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer