← Search

Amy Elliott

Chagrin Falls, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 43W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Elliott to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Silverstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-20 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-11 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Streit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-26 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marla Silverstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-29 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Siddiq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Siddiq
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-08 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Verdova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-03-01 · A18 3.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Pollack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2025-11-14 · C 6.5W BA Pavlish · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Pam Nelson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-07-24 · OD 3.5W BA Hart · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Verdova
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
44.7%
21W–26L · 50.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 56.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 49% of the time
#2 Doubles
49%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
18 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova