← Search

Alison Sikora

Mentor, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
117 matches · 68W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alison Sikora to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history117 matches
L
2026-07-09 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-07 · A40 3.5W CV1 Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Carlisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-02 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Szymanski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-25 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nichole Carlisle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-04 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-06-02 · A40 3.5W CV1 Ferguson · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-28 · A18 3.5W CV1 Brubaker · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandi Ferguson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-03-08 · A18 3.5W CV1 Ferguson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Mallak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-01 · A18 3.5W CV1 Ferguson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katy Donohue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-07-16 · A40 3.5W CV1 Ferguson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-07-14 · A18 3.5W CV Brubaker · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68%
17W–8L · 57% of games
3.5
57.4%
27W–20L · 49.9% of games
5.5
48%
12W–13L · 50.3% of games
6.5
58.8%
10W–7L · 53.1% of games
6.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
35 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
28 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova