← Search

Jean Sharp

Yardley, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
22 matches · 14W–8L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jean Sharp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history22 matches
L
2026-06-11 · No Drama Mama's · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Liedl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-03 · No Drama Mama's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Fithian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Korb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-06-05 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Colleen Liedl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W
2025-05-29 · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deanna Carpentier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2025-05-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Korb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2025-02-19 · No Drama Mama's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maxie Kroen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-11-13 · No Drama Mama's · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Fithian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2024-06-20 · Smart Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Mangas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-06-13 · Smart Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Mangas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2024-05-16 · Smart Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Mangas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-05-09 · Smart Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Mangas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams4 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 50% of the time
#3 Doubles
50%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
41%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match
#2 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert