← Search

Michelle Emerson

Lawrence Township, NJ
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
225 matches · 97W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michelle Emerson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history225 matches
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Jacqueline Luthman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-17 · SPRING CENTRAL/TCC Topspinners · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Luthman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-03 · SPRING CENTRAL/TCC Topspinners · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-13 · SPRING CENTRAL/TCC Topspinners · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Mix
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
Patricia Kleiner / Kim Nguyen
2026-05-07 · Bucks Ballers · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-5
W
2026-04-30 · Bucks Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathryn Peters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-23 · Bucks Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Sauta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-04-16 · Bucks Ballers · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allie Bond
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-31 · Forever 40-Love · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Beth Mapes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-03-24 · Forever 40-Love · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mona Sickles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-03-03 · Forever 40-Love · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annie Pollina
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 36.1% of games
3.0
47.7%
41W–45L · 50.6% of games
3.5
42.4%
50W–68L · 47.9% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
59 matches
#1 Singles
24%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert