← Search

Arthur Gloer

Cary, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 39W–59L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Arthur Gloer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history98 matches
L
2026-07-21 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bob Cwikla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-29 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-06-11 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bob Cwikla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-28 · LOCH.Reynolds · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Danny Yoder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
2026-05-14 · LOCH.Waters · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bob Cwikla
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-18 · LOCH.Waters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brad Kreger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-11 · LOCH.Waters · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kenneth Waters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · LOCH.Waters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-21 · LOCH.Waters · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trevor Hoyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
Shiv Giri / Joe Smith
2026-03-14 · LOCH.Waters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Trevor Hoyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2024-09-21 · LOCH.Heaphy · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 60.5% of games
3.5
29.1%
16W–39L · 41.7% of games
6.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
7.5
25%
2W–6L · 41.5% of games
7.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 47.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
27 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#1 Singles
16%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
15 matches
#2 Singles
12%
12 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer