← Search

Blake Hall

Cary, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 28W–33L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Blake Hall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
L
2026-05-27 · TOC.Kinchen · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Taylor VICK / Chris Johnson
2026-05-17 · PW.Roussin · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-08 · PW.Messer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Marc Hastings
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-03 · PW.Hayward · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-26 · PW.Roussin · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariel Edery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-25 · PW.Hayward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Todd Younkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-04-19 · PW.Roussin · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ariel Edery
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · PW.Hayward · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jason Belyew
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-04-18 · TOC.Kinchen · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Fitzgerald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-12 · PW.Messer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David McDaniel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-11 · PW.Hayward · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacob Comer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · TOC.Kinchen · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
56.2%
18W–14L · 48% of games
4.0
17.6%
3W–14L · 35.3% of games
7.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches
#2 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe