← Search

Kim Rasmussen

— year-end
64 matches · 37W–27L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim Rasmussen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history64 matches
L
2026-03-12 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-27 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · CHAMISAL TC 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-04 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Scholink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
W
2026-01-31 · CHAMISAL TC 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Lin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-15 · CHAMISAL TC 40AW4.0A-DT · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Pam Kirkendall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L
2021-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Maria Galli championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-1
W
2021-06-10 · CDTA 40&O W/E 4.0W Oak Park TC Scrogin Sun 4 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Giertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-4, 1-0
W
2021-06-06 · CDTA 40&O W/E 4.0W Oak Park TC Scrogin Sun 4 $20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Giertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2021-06-02 · NITA S 75CWDc Oak Park TC (Traczyk/Poe) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Deborah Poe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2021-05-17 · NITA W 85CWb TAM (Farinas/Nakamura) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kaitlin Ulbert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
Susan Pearsall / Maria Lobo-Corey
2021-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gabrielle Giertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Teams20 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
55.6%
25W–20L · 49.8% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 50.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
19 matches
#1 Singles
6%
4 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert