← Search

Tricia Dziabis

— year-end
63 matches · 27W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tricia Dziabis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-04-17 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sara Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-27 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sandra Foye
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2026-03-13 · 6 SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Keating
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-4
L
2025-04-22 · SBrock-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sophie Brock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6
L
Caroline Fungaroli / Laura Davidson
2025-03-25 · SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Diane Birkemo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-03-11 · SBrock-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2025-03-03 · SBrock-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katharine Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-11 · SBrock-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heidi Blankenship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-04-22 · *6-CMcGill-CHTC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christa McGill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2024-03-18 · *6-CMcGill-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katharine Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Laura Shaffer / Amanda Lacoff
2024-03-04 · *6-CMcGill-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katharine Walton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-2
L
2023-10-10 · 6-CMcGill/LTomkins CHTC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sara Summers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Teams25 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
32.6%
14W–29L · 43.4% of games
7.0
100%
4W–0L · 65.3% of games
7.5
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
8.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
21 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
16 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams