← Search

Heather Sliwa

Draper, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
165 matches · 91W–74L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heather Sliwa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history165 matches
W
2026-08-05 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lora Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lora Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-24 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lora Lyon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-17 · Cottonwood Club-Haverkost · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Haverkost
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Krissie Summerhays
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Farrell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Camille Weaver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Webster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
Natalie Romaniw / Jennifer Evans
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kumru Uruk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-24 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Winson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
58.4%
87W–62L · 53.5% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 56.2% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
35 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
11 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams