← Search

Amanda Moore

Salt Lake City, UT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 53W–68L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amanda Moore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
L
2026-09-11 · They Torres Up · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dang Quach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-21 · They Torres Up · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dang Quach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-07 · They Torres Up · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Day mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-13 · Tri and Stop Us · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-11 · Tri and Stop Us · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-10 · They Torres Up · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dang Quach mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-05 · LP- Torres · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Daniel Hurst mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-02 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-29 · Topspinners · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Prema Zipp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Megan Leonard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Meghan Kellner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-19 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 53.1% of games
3.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 52.3% of games
4.0
22.6%
7W–24L · 38.2% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 59.6% of games
7.0mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 48.5% of games
7.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 44.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Singles
10%
12 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams