← Search

Michael Racine

— year-end
62 matches · 25W–37L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Racine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-06-20 · EE:Green Mountain Tennis:Racine/Duteau · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bradford Brainard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · EE:Green Mountain Tennis:Racine/Duteau · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vuong Le
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-06 · EE:Green Mountain Tennis:Racine/Duteau · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-11 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Duffany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
Steve Young / Jill Dunn
2026-03-29 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patricia Duffany mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-03-22 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim McManus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-15 · New York Empire:Racine · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-07 · New York Empire:Racine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bruce Beckstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-01 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bree Cotroneo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-02-28 · New York Empire:Racine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Richard Gottschall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim McManus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
Bradford Brainard / Mark Erickson
2026-02-14 · New York Empire:Racine · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Homer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
39.5%
17W–26L · 47.7% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.6% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 45.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 63% of the time
#1 Doubles
63%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams