← Search

Kim McManus

— year-end
73 matches · 40W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kim McManus to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history73 matches
W
2026-08-16 · BTC:Hit For Brains:Weiss · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vivianne Ivanier
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-3
L
2026-08-02 · BTC:Hit For Brains:Weiss · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-8
W
2026-07-12 · BTC:Hit For Brains:Weiss · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Megan OBrien
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
8-4
W
Melissa Thomas / Judith Wimble
2026-05-03 · ESB:Court Authority:Cawley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Williams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-02 · ESB:Court Authority:Cawley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-19 · ESB:Court Authority:Cawley · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with John Homer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-03-22 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Racine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-21 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Weiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-3
W
2026-03-14 · EE:Intangibles:Fonseca/Cawley · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Cawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-02-22 · ESB:Racine/Nichols · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Racine mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-3, 1-0
L
2026-02-21 · ESB:Strausser · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ephrem Gebreselasie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
Teams22 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
81.8%
9W–2L · 68.1% of games
4.0
48.7%
19W–20L · 47.7% of games
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
71.4%
5W–2L · 58.1% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 40.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
36 matches
#1 Singles
23%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
11%
8 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King