← Search

Alisa Stewart

Edmond, OK
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
154 matches · 65W–89L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Alisa Stewart to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history154 matches
W
2026-09-09 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-30 · Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-27 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Bray
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-20 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-09 · Senioritas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynn Neumeister
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-02 · Senioritas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-01 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-11-17 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-27 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Teter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-20 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Leverette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.4% of games
3.5
53%
35W–31L · 50.3% of games
4.0
20.5%
8W–31L · 38.6% of games
6.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 66.2% of games
7.0
19%
4W–17L · 41.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
29 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams