← Search

Jan Foisy

Edmond, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 66W–54L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jan Foisy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-09-02 · SMASH · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Robertson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Mansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-14 · Smash+ · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-04 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with SUSAN LOBSINGER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-30 · Smash+ · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
Lindsey Diffendaffer / Sarah Smith
2026-04-27 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-13 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Traci Grant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-04-06 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathie Strickler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-23 · SMASH · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Vanessa Leverette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-01-15 · Servivors · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristi Nagode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2025-11-17 · SMASH · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Mansell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-11-03 · SMASH · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rouye Choquette
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
3.5
49.3%
36W–37L · 51.9% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
68.4%
26W–12L · 55.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
37%
44 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova