← Search

Anna Marie Barnard

San Diego, CA
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
24 matches · 10W–14L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Anna Marie Barnard to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history24 matches
W
2026-08-07 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Maren Outwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Melinda Meader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-29 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Fitzsimmons · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Hobbie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-22 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Fitzsimmons · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-17 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-07-10 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Natalie Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-07-07 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Polly Kolotas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-03 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Swirhun · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Polly Kolotas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Fitzsimmons · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Barbara Hobbie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-06-03 · SD 6.0 SDTRC/ Fitzsimmons · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stephanie Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-06 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Julia Haims
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-22 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.9% of games
3.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0
50%
5W–5L · 54.7% of games
7.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
9 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
6 matches
#1 Singles
8%
2 matches
#2 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer