← Search

Julia Haims

— year-end
45 matches · 21W–24L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Julia Haims to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history45 matches
L
2026-06-17 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-31 · SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Yu- Hansen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kate Gill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-20 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Swirhun
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-06 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anna Marie Barnard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-29 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-22 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Yu- Hansen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Courtney Zeidan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-01 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:2)/ Swirhun · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-03-23 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Quan Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-03-16 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sheryl Putnam
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-03-09 · SD 3.0 SDTRC (3:1)/ Swirhun · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Helen Smoole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · SD 3.5 SDTRC/ Yu- Hansen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Quan Choi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
Teams14 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
52.6%
20W–18L · 49.1% of games
3.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
38%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
6 matches
#1 Singles
7%
3 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer