← Search

Jason Akers

Lakewood, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
103 matches · 40W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Akers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history103 matches
L
2026-09-01 · BCST GOLD · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-25 · BCST GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-18 · BCST GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Preston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-04 · BCST GOLD · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-28 · BCST GOLD · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tobin Kern
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-14 · BCST RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · BCST RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Glenn Simon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-30 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-23 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-16 · BCST RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-11 · BCST NAVY · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Glen Mizenko
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · BCST RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Young
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
38.3%
36W–58L · 43.4% of games
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 38% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
23 matches
#1 Singles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer