← Search

Ashleigh Crocker

Wilmington, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
21 matches · 9W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Ashleigh Crocker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history21 matches
W
2026-09-14 · Gainer · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Gainer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-13 · Gainer · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teri Kosterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-09-02 · Gainer · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teri Kosterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-23 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mariann Vonatski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-05-13 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Spale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-09 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Paola Marie Colon Barbosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-05-06 · Gainer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Blair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Blair
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-04-30 · Gainer · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Spale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-10 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teri Kosterman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-08 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hannah Flynt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-22 · Gainer · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Spale
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
46.7%
7W–8L · 53.2% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
13 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
6 matches
#1 Singles
5%
1 match
#3 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer