← Search

Paul Bodell

— year-end
54 matches · 19W–35L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Paul Bodell to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history54 matches
L
2026-05-28 · Bent Creek Bad News Bears - Houston · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allan Klinge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-07 · Bent Creek Bad News Bears - Houston · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-04 · Bent Creek Notorious BCG's - Pasic · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kenneth Raffensberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2025-10-24 · Bent Creek - Holbein · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Joao Rodrigues
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-10-03 · Bent Creek - Holbein · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Benjamin Atwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-28 · Bent Creek - Holbein · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Adnan Pasic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2023-08-11 · Bent Creek - Suor · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-1
L
2023-08-08 · Bent Creek - Suor · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Schmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2023-06-03 · Bent Creek - Suor · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Schmid
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2022-07-24 · #2 Doubles · with Erik Ringso championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2022-07-11 · Hempfield - Baum-Fire · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Lovett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2022-07-09 · Hempfield - Baum-Fire · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Daniel Reese
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
Teams14 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 53.3% of games
3.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.7% of games
6.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.2% of games
6.0mixed
47.6%
10W–11L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 25.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 50% of the time
#2 Doubles
50%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
9 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal