← Search

Steven Jeffrey

Lititz, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 139W–80L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Steven Jeffrey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
L
2026-07-26 · RCW - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Fortson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Frederick JR Shaak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · RCW - Sumar · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · RCW - Sumar · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joe Schrader
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-22 · RCW - Campbell · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brian Fortson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · RCW - Campbell · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stephen Nichols
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-31 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Grant Sweitzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-12 · #1 Doubles · with Deborah Jeffrey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · with Deborah Jeffrey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-04 · Hempfield - Pipkin · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bonnie Westheaffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-12-14 · Hempfield Team GRVTY (Banh) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Jeffrey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-12-13 · Hempfield - Arterstri · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Roeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams53 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
0.0
100%
4W–0L · 60.5% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 50.5% of games
3.5
63.6%
28W–16L · 55.2% of games
4.0
38.1%
8W–13L · 46.6% of games
6.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 55.6% of games
7.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 56.9% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
28.6%
4W–10L · 44.2% of games
6.0mixed
73.7%
14W–5L · 60.2% of games
7.0mixed
82.1%
23W–5L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
77 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
53 matches
#1 Singles
4%
9 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal