← Search

Emmett Shaw

Ann Arbor, MI
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 45W–47L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Emmett Shaw to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-07-31 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Natalie Guo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
Syedreza Haider
2026-07-22 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
Azariah Duran / Andres Torres
2026-07-15 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Topoleski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Laura Hanselman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-09 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chris Theriot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kendra Clark mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-19 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Erica Frantz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-17 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sean Howard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-12 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Naoko McKelvey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
Jarrett Langlois
2026-06-10 · CHIP-Howard 18s 4.5M F1 · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
Rachael Ebbing / John Hughes
2026-06-05 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leigh Formicola mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.1%
18W–13L · 57.5% of games
4.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 41.1% of games
7.5mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
33.3%
5W–10L · 47.9% of games
9.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe