← Search

Erica Frantz

Ann Arbor, MI
4.5S year-end 2025
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
19 matches · 12W–7L · seasons 2026–2026

Captains: add Erica Frantz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history19 matches
L
2026-07-09 · CHIP-Clark 18s 5.0 NW · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Zana Kwaiser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-06 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
Winifred Karoub / Max Lukey
2026-06-26 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with James Lang mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Leigh Formicola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-06-19 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 9.0X F · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Emmett Shaw mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-17 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-06-15 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anne Bushroe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-10 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-03 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Naoko McKelvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · BT-Deen 40s 4.5 NW · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-5
W
2026-05-27 · CHIP-Formicola 18s 4.5 NW F · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2026–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 57% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#1 Singles
37%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova