← Search

Michelle Landry

— year-end
40 matches · 19W–21L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Michelle Landry to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history40 matches
W
2026-06-21 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3
W
2026-06-14 · Mountain Park (Icilma Morton)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Icilma Morton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · Mountain Park (Icilma Morton)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Ponce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-31 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 5-7
L
2025-12-13 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-3, 3-6
L
2025-12-06 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2025-11-22 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-15 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2025-11-08 · Cedar Creek (Faye McCorkle)* · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
L
Kelly Richardson / Pam Giddings
2025-08-09 · Team Tara (CONFIRMED) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Bolden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-8
L
2025-08-09 · Team Tara (CONFIRMED) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Julia Bolden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-8
L
Taryn Carlquist / Karen Murray
2025-07-13 · Cedar Creek (Fay McCorkle)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tomeka Blackmon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
Teams17 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
47.2%
17W–19L · 51.1% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 40% of the time
#1 Singles
40%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
1 match
#3 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal