← Search

Stacy Mole

— year-end
39 matches · 28W–11L · seasons 2022–2027

Captains: add Stacy Mole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history39 matches
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with See Moua
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Bantug
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-14 · Deer Lake (Angela Morgan)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soo Monahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · Deer Lake (Angela Morgan)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soo Monahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · Deer Lake (Angela Morgan)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soo Monahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 6-2
L
Jamila Fordham / Susan Fairley
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · with Ann Cha championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-17 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Veeresh Shivakumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-27 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anubhav Lenka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-03-11 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Soo Monahon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-03-03 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-02-17 · St. Marlo (Ann Cha)* · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Greene
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
Teams13 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
85.7%
12W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.1% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.7% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert