← Search

Cecilia Waeltz

O FALLON, IL
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 21W–32L · seasons 2019–2025

Captains: add Cecilia Waeltz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2024-11-24 · Schwaegel (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W
2024-11-03 · Schwaegel (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Schildknecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2024-10-20 · Schwaegel (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Schildknecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2024-02-25 · Schwaegel (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqueline Chiarolanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-5, 0-1
L
2023-12-10 · Schwaegel (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-22 · Schwaegel (F) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sara Schildknecht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2023-10-01 · Schwaegel (F) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-21 · Schwaegel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2023-04-29 · Schwaegel · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-04-17 · Schwaegel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2023-04-02 · Schwaegel · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W
2023-03-12 · Schwaegel · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brooke Ravanelli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2020–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
39.6%
21W–32L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
25 matches
#2 Singles
28%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams