← Search

Jenna Morgan

Lake Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
74 matches · 41W–33L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jenna Morgan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history74 matches
W
2026-04-22 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-15 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-5
W
2026-04-12 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Mcguire
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-01 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-03-15 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Rieder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-4
L
2026-03-11 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-4, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-04 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-02-11 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-3
W
2026-02-04 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-3
L
2026-02-01 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-01-21 · Daws/CAC (SD) · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 65.7% of games
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 58% of games
3.5
48.9%
22W–23L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
30 matches
#2 Singles
27%
20 matches
#1 Singles
15%
11 matches
#1 Doubles
10%
7 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer