← Search

Joan Meek

West Des Moines, IA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
61 matches · 32W–29L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Joan Meek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history61 matches
W
Mary Beth Westercamp / Hennie Baek
2026-07-02 · Bangtson: LifeTime · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Pam Bangtson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-06 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-26 · IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Fay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-04-04 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-29 · IA/Wilkinson/55&Over7.0W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Fay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-0
W
2026-03-21 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Fay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-03-07 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-07 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-01-03 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sarah Nuss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-12-13 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2025-10-25 · Cobb & Richards: Genesis · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joy Bachmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 49.5% of games
3.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 52.3% of games
7.0
44.4%
4W–5L · 57.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
19 matches
#1 Singles
28%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
13 matches
#2 Singles
10%
6 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
5 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal