Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf
123 matches · 70W–53L · seasons 2022–2026
Captains: add Sarah Zinn-Burggraaf to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history123 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Teams48 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
37.5%
9W–15L · 50.2% of games
3.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 49.6% of games
3.5
63%
29W–17L · 55% of games
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 45.9% of games
6.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.1% of games
8.0mixed
50%
9W–9L · 50.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
37 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
32 matches
#1 Singles
7%
8 matches
#2 Singles
7%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.