← Search

Heather Arters

Manheim, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
308 matches · 209W–99L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Heather Arters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history308 matches
W
Paul Elliott / Doreen Fulmer
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Arters9 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jeffery Arters mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-09-12 · Hempfield - Arters8 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with George Georgelis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Keener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Becky Katz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-08-02 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marla Triano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
Nancy Opilo / Casey Davis
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · with Becky Katz championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-16 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · Hempfield - Arters · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Caroline Ulrich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-30 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Ingram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-28 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Audrey Troop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · Hempfield - Arters · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
73.4%
69W–25L · 58.9% of games
4.5
60%
15W–10L · 52.3% of games
7.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.9% of games
8.0
73.3%
66W–24L · 58.7% of games
8.0mixed
63.5%
33W–19L · 54% of games
9.0mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 35.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
146 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
66 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
44 matches
#1 Singles
14%
43 matches
#2 Singles
3%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe