← Search

Catherine Ingram

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
191 matches · 83W–108L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Catherine Ingram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history191 matches
W
2026-08-04 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madhavi Reddy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-21 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brenda Horst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Arters
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
Anna Lamond / Jennifer Small
2026-06-28 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Garber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · Hempfield - Schlageter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer Graham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-12 · Hempfield - Arters · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Hershey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-07 · Hempfield - Triano / Cohen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Kilheffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-02 · Hempfield - Triano / Cohen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Kilheffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
L
2025-11-01 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Iris Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-10-11 · Hempfield - Triano / Cohen · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Kilheffer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · Hempfield Penn Pals (Culp) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Iris Lehman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
60%
3W–2L · 43.3% of games
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
40%
24W–36L · 47.3% of games
8.0
43.8%
14W–18L · 48.9% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 50.5% of games
8.0mixed
46.3%
31W–36L · 48.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
79 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
44 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams