← Search

Anne Long

Aston, PA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 70W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anne Long to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-07-10 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lynn Erskine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · Get Smashed · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Guinan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-29 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Denise Guinan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Absolut Aces · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Mill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-15 · Absolut Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karen Gwynne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-14 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Pam Sorg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-12 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Mill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
Julie Smith / Carol Collison
2026-06-04 · Get Smashed · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Donna Mill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · Absolut Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-01 · Slice Girls · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Mill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-30 · Absolut Aces · #4 Doubles · 3.0 · with Elizabeth Farcht
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-26 · Absolut Aces · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
60%
54W–36L · 54.9% of games
3.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.7% of games
6.0
80%
8W–2L · 66.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#1 Singles
22%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
17 matches
#2 Singles
5%
6 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer