← Search

Tessie Decker

MERCER ISLAND, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
175 matches · 95W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tessie Decker to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history175 matches
W
2026-08-07 · BC-Nelson/Schodde · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dennis Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-19 · BC-Nelson/Schodde · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Andrew Ygona mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · BC-Vegarra · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Holt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · BC-Vegarra · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adam Holt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-07-11 · BC-Nelson/Schodde · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dennis Taylor mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kristen Glant
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-17 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kerri Hatfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-5
L
2026-05-16 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-10 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shamayal Jawed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-26 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Huong Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-04 · MI-Serve-ivors-Jung · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-5
W
2026-03-13 · MI-Fosseen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Stephanie May
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
78.9%
15W–4L · 61.9% of games
4.5
46.6%
41W–47L · 51.3% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 55.3% of games
9.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
67 matches
#1 Singles
22%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
31 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe