← Search

Sarah Newman

Edmonds, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 64W–49L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Sarah Newman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-29 · HBSQ-Rutter · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Lauren Rutter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-16 · HBSQ-Rutter · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nicole Bouche
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · HBSQ-Rutter · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Anya Dalkin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · HBSQ-Rutter · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Beardslee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2025-11-15 · HBSQ-PRF-McDowell · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
L
2025-10-25 · HBSQ-PRF-McDowell · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-03 · HBSQ-PRF-McDowell · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Riley Peschon mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-08-10 · #3 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Anya Dalkin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Lauren Rutter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Nicole Bouche championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.5
43.3%
13W–17L · 51.8% of games
0.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.5mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 58.9% of games
8.0mixed
63.2%
12W–7L · 56.8% of games
9.0mixed
46.2%
12W–14L · 48.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
24 matches
#1 Female Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
4%
4 matches
#1 Female Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer