← Search

Christiane Engman

RAPID CITY, SD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
127 matches · 56W–71L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christiane Engman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history127 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Bussler/Wattenhofer/Engman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Bussler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
Lori Hanson / Brenda Murphey
2026-08-31 · Bussler/Wattenhofer/Engman · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Bussler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · Bussler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Annie Bussler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · Bussler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Wattenhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-10 · Bussler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brenda Murphey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-04-26 · SD Rapid City · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Annie Bussler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
Lori Martin / Nicole Taylor
2026-04-25 · SD Rapid City · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lisa Katzenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · SD Rapid City · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
Elizabeth Duemmel
2025-04-11 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-03-29 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
69.1%
38W–17L · 59.3% of games
3.5
18.5%
10W–44L · 36.6% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 49.1% of games
7.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 39.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
28 matches
#1 Singles
22%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
21 matches
#2 Singles
8%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova