← Search

Brenda Murphey

Black Hawk, SD
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 12W–15L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Brenda Murphey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Hanson/Murphey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-08-31 · Hanson/Murphey · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Claire Reilly-Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-15 · Bussler · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawna Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-07 · Durkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annie Bussler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · Bussler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Wattenhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-30 · Durkin · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · Bussler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Hanson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-16 · Durkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlin Klopfenstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-09 · Durkin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dawn Wattenhofer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-03 · Bussler · #4 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kibbe Conti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
50%
8W–8L · 47.2% of games
3.5
75%
3W–1L · 52.7% of games
7.0
14.3%
1W–6L · 38.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova