← Search

Gwen Hedgepeth

Raleigh, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
237 matches · 148W–89L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Gwen Hedgepeth to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history237 matches
L
2026-08-28 · Ma.Springfield65C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sharon Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-21 · Ma.Springfield65C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-31 · Ma.Springfield65C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deborah Brazee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-23 · Ma.Springfield55A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gina Hartness
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-21 · Ma.Springfield65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-03-31 · Ma.Springfield65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-03-26 · Ma.Springfield55A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcia Springfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-24 · Ma.Springfield65A · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Hope Tharrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-03-17 · Ma.Springfield65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
L
2026-03-10 · Ma.Springfield65A · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Sharon Kucyk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-10-09 · Di.Williams55C · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Laurie Reiss
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-09-26 · Sh.Kucyk65C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Carol Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
79.1%
34W–9L · 61.3% of games
3.5
49.4%
40W–41L · 48.7% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
58.9%
43W–30L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
90%
9W–1L · 65% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
82 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
79 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
76 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova