← Search

Laurie Reiss

Raleigh, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
437 matches · 235W–202L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Laurie Reiss to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history437 matches
W
2026-09-13 · TOC.Conzola · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Theresa Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · TOC.Conzola · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sandra Chapman-Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-11 · Ki.Manning55C · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rossi Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-09 · TOC.Conzola · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-04 · Ki.Manning55C · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Susan Starnes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Di.Williams55T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-02 · Di.Williams55T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzanne Brown
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-30 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Vandenbossche mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joel Nance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · Di.Williams55T · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elisebeth Gelardi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-09 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Leese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-02 · Jo.Nance55M3.5 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Leese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams82 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 55.1% of games
3.0
71.4%
15W–6L · 59.1% of games
3.5
51.6%
98W–92L · 52.7% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 49.2% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 53.1% of games
6.5
62.7%
74W–44L · 55.5% of games
7.5
40%
8W–12L · 46.5% of games
3.5mixed
30%
6W–14L · 41.3% of games
6.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.4% of games
7.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
176 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
127 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
120 matches
#2 Singles
1%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
5 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert