Marsha Timm
116 matches · 58W–58L · seasons 2020–2026
Captains: add Marsha Timm to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history116 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Teams37 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
43.6%
24W–31L · 48.7% of games
7.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 48.6% of games
8.0
59.5%
22W–15L · 52.2% of games
8.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#1 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#3 Female Doubles
2%
2 matches
#2 Female Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.