← Search

Jane Groveman

New York, NY
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 41W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Groveman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
L
2026-08-03 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Fila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-5
L
2026-07-26 · #3 Doubles · with Leigh Flayton championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-25 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nesta George
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-15 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Fila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-07 · Brooklyn: Bernstein · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Xu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Fila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-27 · Gundell/Seelig · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Michele Hootstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-19 · Gundell/Seelig · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Sandra Borrelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
L
2026-05-18 · Matchpoint - 65+ 7.0 W · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Fila
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-14 · Maselbas · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Medea Elvy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-5
W
2026-02-26 · Gundell/Seelig · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Seelig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-12 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lesley Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
0.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 46.9% of games
3.5
47.9%
23W–25L · 49.9% of games
7.0
58.3%
14W–10L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 39% of the time
#3 Doubles
39%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
21 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert