← Search

Lesley Miller

— year-end
62 matches · 29W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lesley Miller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history62 matches
L
2026-08-18 · Moukad/Gastelu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Sheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-13 · Moukad/Gastelu · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Christina Sheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-10 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicole Sharett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-05-28 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Christina Sheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-6
W
2026-05-21 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tracey Amdur
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-17 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leigh Flayton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-11 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Giselle Wyckoff
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
Dana Coppolino / Nikola Hennes
2026-02-26 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Hootstein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-25 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorri Ahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-12 · Gundell/Seelig · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Groveman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-02-11 · Volley Llamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally McKenzie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-02-03 · Gundell/Seelig · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorri Ahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
Teams9 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
75%
9W–3L · 58.4% of games
4.0
40.5%
17W–25L · 45.9% of games
7.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
30 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova