← Search

Ralf Weizenbeck

Denver, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
118 matches · 48W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ralf Weizenbeck to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history118 matches
L
2026-09-02 · GTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Abrams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-23 · WP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nichol Weizenbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · GTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Zachary Hustad
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-16 · WP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nichol Weizenbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-08-09 · WP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Annabel Weizenbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · GTC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Graffagna
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · WP BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nichol Weizenbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-5
L
2026-07-15 · WP BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nichol Weizenbeck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-24 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randal Ankeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-17 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jason Wang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-03 · CACM RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Parker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · CACM GREY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Randal Ankeney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53% of games
4.0
41.7%
15W–21L · 46.7% of games
4.5
42.3%
22W–30L · 45.7% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.7% of games
8.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 48.3% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
49 matches
#1 Doubles
39%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
23 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe