← Search

Cheryl Price

New Orleans, LA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
142 matches · 86W–56L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Price to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history142 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Lambert/18/4.0/MX/GACC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Martina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · Lambert/18/4.0/MX/GACC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Scott Martina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-13 · Walker/40/3.5/MX/CP · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeffrey Bacino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-08 · Lambert/18/4.0/MX/GACC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-29 · Walker/40/3.5/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-15 · Walker/40/3.5/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Brown mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-05 · Favret/4.0/18/NON/GACC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stacy Bonnaffons
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-04 · Stone Lambert/18/3.5/NON/GACC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-04-14 · Favret/4.0/18/NON/GACC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-13 · Stone Lambert/18/3.5/NON/GACC · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-07 · Coco/40+/3.5/NOD/GACC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-04-06 · Stone Lambert/18/3.5/NON/GACC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jaime Lambert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
85.4%
41W–7L · 67% of games
4.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.9% of games
6.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 67.2% of games
7.5
28.6%
6W–15L · 46.3% of games
3.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 51.4% of games
4.0mixed
21.1%
4W–15L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 52.9% of games
8.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
48 matches
#1 Singles
32%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
14 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe