← Search

Aimee Vaughn

New Orleans, LA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 64W–22L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Aimee Vaughn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-07-29 · Favret-Thomas/40/DIII/TWN/XU · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Brandy Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Blosser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-26 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michelle Biehler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-07-19 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Riley Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Darbi Philibert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Schenck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-09 · Favret-Thomas/40/DIII/TWN/XU · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cheryl Naruse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-07 · Holder/40/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Wolf mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-01 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Blosser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-25 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Karas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Holder/40/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Javier Jacome mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-15 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Robert Schenck mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams34 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
4.0
94.4%
17W–1L · 69.6% of games
4.5
80%
12W–3L · 61% of games
7.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 59.9% of games
8.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 63.2% of games
4.0mixed
92.9%
13W–1L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 48.7% of games
8.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 56.6% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
16 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert