← Search

Alex Mercer

Castle Rock, CO
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 51W–58L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Alex Mercer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
L
2026-08-26 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lance Bourque
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · CPV NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gersack
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-24 · CPV NAVY · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edward Kolb
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-17 · CPV NAVY · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-31 · CPV RED · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-13 · CPV RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · CPV RED · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-22 · CPV RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Greg Brooks
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-04-15 · CPV RED · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samuel Wisen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-08-21 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2024-08-14 · CPV RED · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
39.2%
29W–45L · 47.8% of games
7.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 55.9% of games
8.0mixed
57.7%
15W–11L · 51.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
32 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
26 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova