← Search

Nabeel Meghji

Aurora, CO
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 111W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Nabeel Meghji to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
W
2026-08-23 · PRC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-23 · APR-E RED · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Degitis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · PRKR ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Aberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-09 · PRC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-06 · PRKR ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Aberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-02 · PRC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Christie Dyer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · APR-E RED · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Michelle Degitis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-07-30 · PRKR ORANGE · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jeff Aberle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · PRC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
Heyden Pue / Valerie Rose
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Brooke O'Drobinak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · with Janice Jensen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-14 · JCC GREEN · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brooke O'Drobinak mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.9% of games
4.0
66.7%
44W–22L · 55.1% of games
4.5
60%
3W–2L · 55.7% of games
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 67.1% of games
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.5% of games
8.0mixed
57.6%
19W–14L · 54.7% of games
8.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
41 matches
#1 Male Doubles
6%
11 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal