← Search

Lisa Lash

Centennial, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
214 matches · 117W–97L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Lash to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history214 matches
L
2026-08-23 · LTFC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Moses mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-02 · LTFC PURPLE · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Moses mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-23 · LTFC ORANGE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Janet Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-16 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Marle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-12 · LTFC PURPLE · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Moses mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-05 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Henry Sanin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-28 · LTFC PURPLE · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mitchell Kaplan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-18 · LTFC RED · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Lopez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Kristen Lowe / Katie Kennedy
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Emily Marle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-11 · LTFC RED · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adriana Sosa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-09 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Goetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
51.4%
37W–35L · 51.9% of games
3.5
55.1%
27W–22L · 51.1% of games
6.0mixed
81.6%
31W–7L · 60.3% of games
6.5mixed
45%
9W–11L · 50.4% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
93 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
33 matches
#1 Singles
8%
16 matches
#2 Singles
4%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams